The National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC) has finally broken its silence over the alleged extortion of traders in Onitsha market.
The controversy began when popular social media activist, Verydarkman, accused the agency of demanding N700,000 from shop owners whose stores were sealed during a recent raid.
Watch the video HERE
According to NAFDAC, two administrative charges were enforced against the traders.
The first charge was an investigative fee of N5 million for selling unregistered products, which was later reduced to N200,000 after the traders pleaded for leniency.
And the second charge was a N2 million fine for violating Good Storage and Distribution Practices, which was reduced to N500,000.
NAFDAC’s statement seems to be a direct response to Verydarkman’s allegations, which went viral on social media.
Furthermore, the agency maintains that the charges were legitimate and in line with their regulatory framework.
However, the question remains: were the charges truly justified, or was there indeed extortion involved?
Also Read:
Speed Darlington Launches Giveaway For Fans Amidst Call For His Arrest
Korean Star Actor Choi Jung Woo is Dead
Speed Darlington; Nigerians Call For Arrest After Singer Admits To R*ping 15yr Old Girl
The NAFDAC Raid!
Recall that NAFDAC recently carried out a raid at the Onitsha Bridge Head Market in Anambra State,
targeting stores selling unregistered, banned, expired, substandard, and falsified medicines.
The agency’s actions were aimed at protecting public health and ensuring compliance with regulatory standards.
As the investigation continues, it remains to be seen whether NAFDAC’s explanation will satisfy the public and the traders involved.
One thing is certain, however: transparency and accountability are essential in regulatory agencies,
and any allegations of extortion must be taken seriously.
Meanwhile the outcome of this controversy will likely have implications for NAFDAC’s reputation and its relationship with the public.
Will the agency be able to restore trust and demonstrate its commitment to protecting public health without engaging in extortionate practices?